Rascals case in brief
In the beginning, in 1989, more than 90 children at the Little Rascals Day Care Center in Edenton, North Carolina, accused a total of 20 adults with 429 instances of sexual abuse over a three-year period. It may have all begun with one parent’s complaint about punishment given her child.
Among the alleged perpetrators: the sheriff and mayor. But prosecutors would charge only Robin Byrum, Darlene Harris, Elizabeth “Betsy” Kelly, Robert “Bob” Kelly, Willard Scott Privott, Shelley Stone and Dawn Wilson – the Edenton 7.
Along with sodomy and beatings, allegations included a baby killed with a handgun, a child being hung upside down from a tree and being set on fire and countless other fantastic incidents involving spaceships, hot air balloons, pirate ships and trained sharks.
By the time prosecutors dropped the last charges in 1997, Little Rascals had become North Carolina’s longest and most costly criminal trial. Prosecutors kept defendants jailed in hopes at least one would turn against their supposed co-conspirators. Remarkably, none did. Another shameful record: Five defendants had to wait longer to face their accusers in court than anyone else in North Carolina history.
Between 1991 and 1997, Ofra Bikel produced three extraordinary episodes on the Little Rascals case for the PBS series “Frontline.” Although “Innocence Lost” did not deter prosecutors, it exposed their tactics and fostered nationwide skepticism and dismay.
With each passing year, the absurdity of the Little Rascals charges has become more obvious. But no admission of error has ever come from prosecutors, police, interviewers or parents. This site is devoted to the issues raised by this case.
On Facebook
Little Rascals Day Care Case
This Facebook page is an offshoot of littlerascalsdaycarecase.org, which addresses the wrongful prosecution of the Edenton Seven and other such victims.
Click for earlier Facebook posts archived on this site
Click to go to
Today’s random selection from the Little Rascals Day Care archives….
How to uncover ritual abuse: a foolproof recipe
Oct. 17, 2012
“Little Rascals is a most important case, because it demonstrates how the mind set of interviewers can be transmitted to the children and persuade them to disclose events that never happened. A San Diego grand jury which investigated child abuse observed:
Of particular interest is the information received about the Little Rascals case in North Carolina. Eighty-five percent of the children received therapy with three therapists in the town; all of these children eventually reported satanic abuse. Fifteen percent of the children were treated by different therapists in a neighboring city; none of (these) children reported abuse of any kind after the same period of time in therapy.
“In effect, the Edenton (multiple victim, multiple offender) case was a real-life replication of the type of laboratory experiment that could never be done for ethical reasons:
- Select a town or city in any area of the U.S. or Canada.
- Take 90 children, and divide them into two equally sized test and control groups.
- Have the test group interrogated by therapists who believe in ritual abuse, using direct and repeated questions.
- Have the control group independently interrogated by therapists who are skeptical of ritual abuse using general questioning.
- Compare rates of disclosures of ritual abuse from the two groups. “
The probable result would be that close to 100% of the test group and about 0% of the control group would reveal ritual abuse.”
– From “Ritual abuse cases in day care centers” on ReligiousTolerance.org, (Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance)
High school students introduced to ‘Innocence Lost’

June 10, 2016
It’s heartening to see that, 25 years later, “Innocence Lost” is still shining light on the wrongful prosecution of the Edenton Seven – and for a younger audience! This is a note from Judy Griffin, a teacher at Hamilton High School in Michigan, who recently rediscovered Ofra Bikel’s eight-hour masterpiece:
“I want you to know how helpful it is (to have “Innocence Lost” available online). I teach in a resource room English class. The kids have no cognitive issues, but reading is a tremendous struggle. When they can receive the information through really good videos like this one, we can cover some great information.
“We start by reading Edward R. Murrow’s introduction to ‘This I Believe.’ Then the students create digital versions of their own. After that, they view ‘Good Night, and Good Luck.’ They have just learned about McCarthyism at this point in U.S. History, so it is fresh in their minds.
“We move then into The Crucible. The students are then asked to compare this to ‘Good Night, and Good Luck.’ They read ‘Why I wrote The Crucible’ by Arthur Miller.
“At the conclusion, we talk about how these hysterias are repeated and actually happened even prior to Salem. I introduce the Day Care scandal, and was thrilled to find the original ‘Frontline’ episodes. I had seen it when it aired!
“They are now researching various aspects of the hysteria. Some are looking at ‘satanic ritual abuse,’ some are looking at how hysteria spreads, some are researching what happened to the various defendants, and some are looking at the causes. We emphasize that this is not unique to any of these situations, and the point of this all is to show how vulnerable societies are to hysteria….”
![]()
When imaginary crime leads to real punishment
Aug. 20, 2015
“In the mid-1980s, a friend of mine testified on behalf of an elementary-school teacher who had been accused of being a pedophile.
“A child had told his mother that the teacher had taught them about ‘boobies and dicks’ and had drawn a picture on the blackboard that sounded suspiciously to the mother like an image of an ejaculating penis.
“The police had raced to the classroom and confiscated the damning evidence: several copies of ‘Moby-Dick.’ What the teacher had drawn was a whale and its spout.
“Looking back, we can see that the only boobies involved in this case were the adults. But whenever we are in the midst of a moral panic, as we were in the 1980s, we feel that our alarm is reasonable and that punitive solutions are appropriate.
“Dicks? That child knew the word ‘dicks’? Cancel sex ed! Run that teacher out of town!…”
– From “A Very Model Moral Panic” by Carol Tavris in the Wall Street Journal (Aug. 7)
For Little Rascals DA, mum was always the word
March 29, 2013
“ELIZABETH CITY – Attorneys for the seven defendants in the Edenton child abuse case want to know what techniques were used to elicit accusations from the children…. Prosecutors don’t want to tell them….
“(District Attorney H.P.) Williams would not address a reporter’s questions about how the Edenton investigation was conducted….
“Mr. Williams declined to say how the Edenton investigation grew from complaints by three families to its current size. He declined to say how they communicated with parents or whether a letter was sent out.
“He would not discuss who had interviewed the children or what interview techniques had been used….”
– From “Prosecutors won’t discuss techniques” in the Raleigh News & Observer (Feb. 25, 1990)
Two decades later Williams, though no longer district attorney, was still “not in a position to talk about it.”
Coincidentally – or not – the Little Rascals story shared Page 2C with one noting that “Social workers are trying to determine why reported cases of child abuse and neglect in North Carolina jumped 27 percent in 1989, while cases nationally are expected to rise only 3 percent or 4 percent….”
A consultant with the state Division of Social Services observed that “Any time you get a radical increase in the number of complaints, you’re probably getting a number of complaints of questionable validity…..Folks who make those reports need to use some common sense.”





